WebJun 17, 2016 · The Indian Majority Act, 1875 in section 3 (1) has categorically stated that a person domiciled in India shall attain the age of majority on completing 18 years. Therefore, under the statute 18 years can be accepted as the … WebIrfan vs State of Madhya Pradesh: Supreme court faced challenge in case of Irfan vs State of Madhya Pradesh to identify the mitigating circumstances and to ensure a convict-centric approach so that the imposition of capital punishment becomes rarer, fairer, and principled.
IRFAN MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF M.P. Madhya Pradesh High …
Web08.10.2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Bench at Jabalpur whereby the respondent’s conviction under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 of Indian Penal Code Web, 2024 Latest Caselaw 5519 MP biodiversity environmental impact assessment
Irfan Khan v. State Of M.P. Madhya Pradesh High Court
WebFeb 9, 2024 · Irfan v. State of Madhya Pradesh In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh MCRC 25211/2024 Before Justice Shailendra Shukla Decided on July 05, 2024 Relevancy of the Case: Bail application in a case involving allegations of rape and recording the act on the pretext of marriage Statutes and Provisions Involved WebFeb 17, 2024 · Madhya Pradesh High Court. Irfan @ Baccha vs State Of M.P. on 21 October, 2024. February 17, 2024. By admin ... Free for one month and pay only if you like it. Madhya Pradesh High Court Irfan @ Baccha vs State Of M.P. on 21 October, 2024Author: Vivek Rusia – : 1 :-THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE D.B.:Hon’ble Shri … WebState of Madhya Pradesh & Ors ...Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge dated 6 January 2024 at the Gwalior Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, dismissing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.1 3. biodiversity environment southland